<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More TechCrunch50 Flap With a Texas Twist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://austinstartup.com/2008/08/more-techcrunch50-flap-with-a-texas-twist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://austinstartup.com/2008/08/more-techcrunch50-flap-with-a-texas-twist/</link>
	<description>All About Austin&#039;s Emerging Technology Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:05:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Muse</title>
		<link>http://austinstartup.com/2008/08/more-techcrunch50-flap-with-a-texas-twist/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Muse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.austinstartup.com/?p=726#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Ritu - the post that Jason wrote was not a post, but instead an email he sent to his mailing list.  I cut and paste his email message on my blog in the form of a blog post.  Mike did the same and I gave him a little love indicating I got the idea from him.  Anyway, Deb, a sometime-commenter on my blog, suggested in such specific terms that Jason had plagiarized her work I felt that it was justifiable to let Jason know what she was saying.  If she was right he needed to be called out and if she was lying she needed to be called out.  I simply posted the email from Deb.  Jason immediately denied her claim.  Deb quit responding to email or phone messages - I can only assume she was lying.  For what purpose is still a mystery.   Even Chris suggests she is lying.  Again, it makes no sense...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ritu &#8211; the post that Jason wrote was not a post, but instead an email he sent to his mailing list.  I cut and paste his email message on my blog in the form of a blog post.  Mike did the same and I gave him a little love indicating I got the idea from him.  Anyway, Deb, a sometime-commenter on my blog, suggested in such specific terms that Jason had plagiarized her work I felt that it was justifiable to let Jason know what she was saying.  If she was right he needed to be called out and if she was lying she needed to be called out.  I simply posted the email from Deb.  Jason immediately denied her claim.  Deb quit responding to email or phone messages &#8211; I can only assume she was lying.  For what purpose is still a mystery.   Even Chris suggests she is lying.  Again, it makes no sense&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ritu</title>
		<link>http://austinstartup.com/2008/08/more-techcrunch50-flap-with-a-texas-twist/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Ritu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.austinstartup.com/?p=726#comment-333</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t we just look at the blog post times and figure out who wrote it first.

Also, while the advise is valuable to startups, you can find the same advise at many places on the internet as well as in other conferences like TiE etc. So, whats the big deal anyways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t we just look at the blog post times and figure out who wrote it first.</p>
<p>Also, while the advise is valuable to startups, you can find the same advise at many places on the internet as well as in other conferences like TiE etc. So, whats the big deal anyways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

